The fastest way to turn a postcode into a decision-ready site pack.
SiteSift generates a cited 2–4 page pack (constraints, local context, comps, and Go / Caution / Stop flags) in minutes — built for early-stage screening.
Who this is for
If you screen sites weekly and need a consistent output you can share, SiteSift is designed for you.
Faster shortlisting.
Quick packs to send to buyers.
Repeatable client-ready briefs.
The short version
Choose the right tool for your workflow
A consistent 'site pack' output (2–4 pages) every time
Citations-first so you can trust (and defend) the facts
A lightweight workflow — no training, no massive platform
Fast screening before deeper work
End-to-end site sourcing + pipeline workflows, prospecting, alerts, etc. (powerful but heavier)
A one-off commercial report ordered per site for due diligence packs (credible, but not SaaS-flow)
COMPARISON
How SiteSift compares
See how SiteSift stacks up against other UK land and planning tools
Best for
Early-stage screening
What you get
Cited 2–4 page site pack + Go/Caution/Stop + shareable output
Typical friction
None: self-serve
Why SiteSift wins
Consistent pack, citations-first, fast
Best for
Site sourcing + assessing land
What you get
Platform for finding and assessing opportunities
Typical friction
Licences + broader platform learning curve
Why SiteSift wins
SiteSift is report-first, simpler for screening output
Best for
Planning activity + mapping workflows
What you get
Mapping, planning insight, alerts/workflows
Typical friction
Platform depth + onboarding
Why SiteSift wins
SiteSift is faster when you just need a pack
Best for
Commercial planning due diligence reports
What you get
Report-based planning / constraints checks
Typical friction
Often ordered per-report; slower loop
Why SiteSift wins
SiteSift is self-serve SaaS + instant packs
Best for
GIS-style constraint reporting
What you get
Layers + PDF reporting
Typical friction
More GIS-like
Why SiteSift wins
SiteSift is built for non-GIS teams
Best for
Layered PDFs for property transactions
What you get
PDF packaging of datasets
Typical friction
Transaction-oriented
Why SiteSift wins
SiteSift focuses on screening decisions + workflow
Best for
Pay-per-site mapping + constraints
What you get
On-demand mapping + checks
Typical friction
Still a platform
Why SiteSift wins
SiteSift's output is the pack + decisioning
Best for
Quick free checks
What you get
Free single checks/tools
Typical friction
Not unified into a pack
Why SiteSift wins
SiteSift bundles into one consistent, shareable pack
DIFFERENTIATION
What makes SiteSift different?
Three ways SiteSift stands out from other tools
Most tools are great at exploration. SiteSift is great at decision-ready output: one consistent pack you can share, store, and compare.
If a constraint is mentioned, it's linked back to the source — and AI commentary is clearly separate. No blended 'AI says' confusion.
This is the moment when you need speed and consistency — before you spend time on deeper feasibility.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about how SiteSift compares to other tools